Two short weeks ago over 800 youth anti-genocide leaders from around the country came to Washington D.C. as part of Pledge2Protect, a conference designed to educate, empower and highlight the work of activists who are driving the movement to prevent and stop genocide and mass atrocities (see this blog post to learn more about the conference and the campaign).
Monday, November 11th was also the culmination of the first phase of Pledge on Camera, part of Pledge2Protect, and a partnership between WITNESS and STAND, the student-led division of Genocide Intervention Network.
Over 600 youth anti-genocide leaders lobbied their Senators as part of the largest genocide prevention lobby day in history – and they’re also ushering in a new way for citizens to lobby Congress.
Pledge On Camera was designed to remind Congress of the moral and political imperative to ensure that genocide will not occur on their watch or in the future – to make “never again” a reality once and for all. The anti-genocide movement is calling for Congress to create the first comprehensive genocide and mass atrocities prevention legislation.
In this first phase of the campaign, and in support of the lobby day, students have created over 500 video messages for their Senators. Chapters in each state chose the best messages from their state and integrated and remixed them into the core video (and below) that STAND and WITNESS have produced (view full credits).
Click here to watch personalized video examples, ranging from fully remixed videos to fantastic video introductions and calls to action from student and community leaders in the Senators’ states.
As noted in another session proposal, video as an advocacy tool is increasingly accessible, with many more influentials taking notice and being galvanized to action as a result. The National Journal reported on the potential impact of video as an advocacy tool in a cover story earlier this fall (featuring the campaign noted above), and a major takeaway was that video advocacy has barely begin to scratch the surface of our collective efforts. Video can play a multitude of roles in our causes.
Now that we have empowered hundreds of STAND activists around the country with the skills, experience, and understanding of video as an advocacy tool, we are looking forward to building off of this foundation. Knowing that many other organizations and causes are working to define the role that video and custom content play in their advocacy, we would like to discuss video advocacy from 30,000 feet.
Topics to consider for the session might include:
-lessons learned
-integration of video into preexisting advocacy campaigns
-value added of collaboratively edited content
-efficacy of high production value content
-useful methods of delivery for video
[Session proposal] On commenting and issues of reverence
Monday, November 23rd, 2009I manage most of the US Holocaust Memorial Museum’s social media outreach and I’d like to pitch a session to talk through the issues of commenting on different social media channels in order to think about how the Museum can serve its memorial and education functions effectively through different interfaces and different cultures of use.
For instance, Flickr’s comments (which appear below photos) and notes (which appear on top of photos) have raised some flags for us. There are plenty of good reasons to put the Museum’s photographs on Flickr or any other photo-sharing site (access, collective knowledge, etc.), but since the Museum is primarily responsible for safe-guarding the memory of Holocaust victims, is Flickr an okay place to do that? I’m interested here in the point that when we put photographs of the Holocaust on the web, we’re arguably putting artifacts out there. (Yes, these are “digital surrogates,” but not in content—the image is the same whether it’s printed on paper or composed out of bits.) If artifacts bear witness to the lives and suffering of people, can we put them on Flickr and let people mark them up with tags, and comments and notes, with the latter actually amounting to a defacement of the photo since it appears on the image? Can we put stuff on Flickr and turn off all the conduits for communication, even if it’s a violation of the culture of the space? If you have to turn off the commenting features in a social media space, is it better to opt out?
I’d also like to talk a little bit about how we can handle the comments we do get in more useful ways. First, I want to think about why we save all of them in these spaces. We don’t record idle chatter in gallery spaces (at least, not without appropriate signage), so why should we record it online? Is it appropriate to save everything people contribute to social media spaces? If not, then can we just delete all comments wholesale after a proclaimed period of time—90 days, or whatever? (I’m not huge on this, but I want to play devil’s advocate.) If it is appropriate, can we acknowledge the limitations of the interfaces and ask: should we archive comments after certain time periods and start fresh so people don’t have to scroll through 90 pages of commentary?
My point here is to think through preserving all of these comments and if we’re going to save them, how to make them useful. Can we create ways to sort and tag them so people looking for meaningful threads of dialogue or researchers or museum staff trying to track interactions can cut through the content in more efficient ways than scrolling? (Note: I think I’m proposing this a bit as a reaction against the way social media sites privilege “most recent” activity. While I think it’s important to be able to know what’s happening “right now,” or tomorrow, sometimes what I’m interested in happened 6 months or 6 years ago.)
I’d be curious to know from the more tech-savvy than I how feasible it would be to take comments from social media spaces and drop them into a digital archive that would allow searching and categorizing by platform, content, content type, etc. And I’m curious to know if people think this is worth doing. Thanks for reading.
Tags: archive, commenting, culture, memorial, preservation, proposal, user-generated content
Posted in Proposals | 8 Comments »