Cultural Looting: the seizure of archives and libraries by Einsatzstab
Reichsleiter Rosenberg, 1940-45
Martin Dean, USHMM
Introduction
The seizure of Jewish religious artefacts and books began in Germany
in the late 1930s. During the war the Nazis extended such looting to the
occupied territories, as the cultural counterpart of the physical destruction
of the Jewish people. The greater part of the Jews' cultural heritage
was also destroyed: religious objects were melted down and Jewish books
were burned or sent for pulp. The Nazis decided, however, to preserve
a sample of Jewish culture for 'scientific' purposes, as part of a larger
program of 'enemy research'.
A multitude of German agencies and individuals participated in the looting
of cultural objects throughout Europe. Amongst the most active participants
were the men of Himmler's Security Police, the Wehrmacht and Göring's
Office of the Four Year Plan, sometimes acting in direct competition with
each other. For this reason a number of 'authorisations' were issued from
Berlin, to assist in co-ordinating activities and to establish a pecking
order amongst the agencies involved.
In January 1940 Hitler informed all offices of the Party and State that
Alfred Rosenberg, the Party's ideologue, should be assisted in assembling
a library for the planned new educational and research institute of the
Party, the Hohe Schule, to be located at the Chiemsee in Bavaria. The
library would contain 500 000 volumes and there would be a multi-purpose
auditorium accommodating an audience of 3000 people. Preparations for
the Hohe Schule also included other branches within the Reich, such as
a 'Centre for Research on the Jewish Question' in Frankfurt.
Looting in the West
In the summer of 1940 Rosenberg received information about the availability
of several libraries and archives of Masonic lodges in Paris. He wrote
to Hitler on 1 July requesting that this material of great historical
and political value be transported to Germany and put at the disposal
of the Hohe Schule. Accordingly on 5 July 1940 General Keitel informed
the commanders in the western occupied areas that the Führer had determined
that the Geheime Staatspolizei - assisted by the archivists of Rosenberg
- would search libraries, archives and Masonic lodges for such enemy materials
in order to confiscate them.
The Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg (ERR) was formed on 17 July 1940
as a special unit of his own Foreign Political Office. It operated in
close co-operation with the Wehrmacht and Security Police in the occupied
territories. The officers of the ERR assumed the authority to appropriate
all writings by and on the Freemasons and Jews. They were to be used for
the continuation of the war by other means at the ideological level.
Amongst the materials seized in Paris by the ERR were books from the
Alliance Israélite Universelle, the Ecole Rabbinique, the Bibliotheca
Polska and also the Rothschild libraries. In some places, such as Amsterdam,
valuable Jewish items were uncovered despite careful efforts to conceal
them from the Nazis. In Brussels during the summer of 1941 members of
the ERR even seized books from the former homes of Jews. The aims of such
seizures were partly to deny public access to 'enemy' materials, as well
as the preservation of items of value for Nazi propaganda and research
purposes. Only a few copies of specific books were intended to be kept
for research.
Operations in occupied Soviet territories
Following the invasion of the Soviet Union similar archival commandos
were sent in by Rosenberg in his capacity as newly appointed Minister
for the occupied eastern territories. For instance, an operational unit
of the ERR started work in Minsk on 18 November 1941. With a staff of
some 15 Germans and up to 30 local workers its main task was the evaluation
of captured cultural objects, although it also had some active 'cultural
tasks' in the occupied territories.
A renewed authorisation for ERR operations was issued by Hitler on 1
March 1942. It granted to the ERR the right to confiscate material thought
to be useful for the ideological tasks of the Nazi Party and the future
scientific research of the Hohe Schule. Shortly afterwards, on 28 March
1942, the Hohe Schule branch in Frankfurt issued a circular to the offices
of the ERR in Ukraine requesting all relevant materials relating to the
Jewish question. The ERR in Kiev reported in June the discovery of some
90 000 volumes of Jewish and Hebrew books, many in Yiddish, which would
be of interest to the Hohe Schule. A large consignment of Jewish books
was therefore sent directly from Kiev to Frankfurt at the end of September
1942.
In Minsk the ERR Work-Group collected hundreds of thousands of books
in various depots and spent much time attempting to catalogue these collections.
Some 118 Belorussian institutions, mostly libraries, were examined. Forty-five
were locations in Minsk, the remainder scattered throughout Belorussia,
in the various regional centres, such as Mogilev. According to ERR reports,
problems were encountered with local staff selling off library books at
street markets in order to supplement their meagre income.
In Vilnius all important Jewish book colections were concentrated in
the building of the Jewish Scientific Institute (YIVO). Books from at
least 300 synagogues and various private collections were involved. The
leading anti-Semitic scholar, Dr. J. Pohl, of the Frankfurt Intitute for
Research on the Jewish Question selected one fifth of the books for shipping
and ordered the rest to be sold for pulp to a paper mill for 19 Reichsmark
per ton of paper. After the war remnants of the collection were transferred
to YIVO's new base in New York.
Initially the plan was to keep most of the seized literature in the occupied
territories, with only items of special importance to be shipped to Germany.
As the tide of war turned against the Germans in 1943, however, increasingly
desperate efforts were made to evacuate materials to prevent them falling
back into enemy hands. One example of this process of evacuation is the
odyssey of part of the Communist Party archives from Smolensk, which to
this day still resides close to the U.S. Capital in Washington DC.
Documentary evidence unearthed recently by Patricia Grimsted confirms
that CP archival materials from Smolensk were evacuated in early 1943
to Vilnius, where they were housed in a Bendictine convent. By the end
of 1944 most of the collection had made its way to Pless castle, near
Ratibor in Silesia, which was the archival collection centre of the ERR
for materials relating to the Labour Movement (including Socialism and
Communism).
About one million books from the Soviet territories had been piled up
near Ratibor by 1944, although many books and papers suffered damage due
to the haphazard means of evacuation. (For a statistical analysis of its
operations in the East prepared by the ERR, see IIIP14.) Included in materials
seized in the Soviet Union were Soviet propaganda pamphlets and old books
from the Tsarist period.
Within Germany many seized collections were moved to depots in the countryside,
due to the dangers in the cities from Allied bombing. At the end of the
war hundreds of thousands of books from all over Europe were found by
the Allies in these ERR depots.
Conclusion
The photographs in Album III, prepared by the ERR, record the seizure,
sorting and transport of books, documents and other cultural objects from
all over German-occupied Europe. The systematic looting of cultural objects
was parallel to the treatment of Jews and other groups determined as being
hostile to the Reich, according to the Nazi's own racial and political
ideology.
Nazi attempts to control and collate 'enemy materials' resulted unintentionally
in the preservation of at least part of the libraries and archives looted.
After the war, U.S. Forces in Germany undertook considerable efforts to
return Nazi looted items where possible. However, with the aid of new
archival materials from the former Soviet Union and other countries, including
some captured ERR records, a more detailed picture of Nazi looting and
its effects can now be drawn. It is only on the basis of detailed archival
research that the fate of many 'lost' items can be clarified and perhaps
in some cases that these items can be returned to their rightful owners.
|