On October 19, the Obama Administration unveiled a new strategy toward Sudan, which aims to end the humanitarian crisis in Darfur, as well as ensure the implementation of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement. The new policy promises to offer incentives if Khartoum makes progress and "increased pressure" if it does not.
They cited several critical lessons from past dealings with the government of Sudan:
• The United States cannot succeed in achieving our policy by focusing exclusively on Darfur or CPA implementation -- both must be addressed seriously and simultaneously, while also working to resolve and prevent conflict throughout Sudan. • United States policy must be agile enough to address discrete emergency crises, while maintaining a sustained focus on long-term stability. • To advance peace and security in Sudan, we must engage with allies and with those with whom we disagree. United States diplomacy must be both sustained and broad, encompassing not just the National Congress Party, SPLM, and major Darfuri rebel groups but also critical regional and international actors. • Assessments of progress and decisions regarding incentives and disincentives must not be based on process-related accomplishments (i.e., the signing of a MOU or the issuance of a set of visas), but rather based on verifiable changes in conditions on the ground. • Accountability for genocide and atrocities is necessary for reconciliation and lasting peace. • It must be clear to all parties that Sudanese support for counterterrorism objectives is valued, but cannot be used as a bargaining chip to evade responsibilities in Darfur or implementing the CPA.
And outlines what their priorities will be moving forward:
1. A definitive end to conflict, gross human rights abuses, and genocide in Darfur. 2. Implementation of the North-South CPA that results in a peaceful post-2011 Sudan, or an orderly path toward two separate and viable states at peace with each other. 3. Ensure that Sudan does not provide a safe haven for international terrorists.
To learn more, read coverage of the new strategy in The New York Times and The Washington Post.